|
|
Post by fjohnson on Jul 3, 2017 20:29:23 GMT
When did censorship become the norm at heightism hub? I posted an article ”Bigger is not better- a Vagina story”, and it was removed. It was based on my personal experience, and it as not vulgar or hate filled, but a real life story.
So for the thought police to take this down. Why? I know several people read it, and for those who did, can you write here and tell me your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 3, 2017 23:00:40 GMT
The post violated the rules because it had nothing to do with heightism. Beyond being against the rules, the whole post was ridiculous to begin with being that it was full of pseudo-scientific evolutionary psychology BS, which wasn't posted by you, but it was just an awful look altogether. This is not a dating forum anyway, it's a forum about heightism. There are specific rules to follow for posts in regard to dating. You seem to only care about the dating aspect of heightism, so make sure that you follow the guidelines if you're going to continue to post about dating.
|
|
|
|
Post by fjohnson on Jul 4, 2017 0:45:03 GMT
Mr. Administrator
Maybe you need to censor your articles. Does this look familiar?
The happy goat fuck rides again: The usual suspects
The loon who posted that is a mixed bag of dumblejuice and idiot flakes.
It's absolutely appalling, isn't it? As you said, this norm is so extreme that even other people notice it, but yet, these simpletons within our ranks are trying to burn every bridge that we could cross to link with potential allies. These self-loathing cowards are absolutely disgusting.
YOU ARE BURNING THE BRIDGE I AM ON. I AM ON YOUR SIDE. I AM A MALE 5’8” AND TAKEN HEIGHTIST BS FOR YEARS. I HAVE BEEN PASSED OVER FOR MANAGERIAL POSITIONS BECAUSE I WAS NOT 6’ AND SO HAVE MY FRIENDS. EVERY BOSS I EVER HAD WAS 6’ OR TALLER, WITH ONLY ONE EXCEPTION. WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THAT?
Beyond being against the rules, the whole post was ridiculous to begin with being that it was full of pseudo-scientific evolutionary psychology BS, which wasn't posted by you, but it was just an awful look altogether. This is not a dating forum anyway, it's a forum about heightism. There are specific rules to follow for posts in regard to dating. You seem to only care about the dating aspect of heightism, so make sure that you follow the guidelines if you're going to continue to post about dating.
HEIGHTISM HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DATING? SINCE WHEN? THE NUMBER 1 COMPLAINT BY MEN LIKE US IS THAT WOMEN REJECT US WITHOUT A SECOND THOUGHT, DUE TO HEIGHT, AND THEY THINK THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH DOING SO.
AND IF YOU ARE SO SURE OF YOURSELF, WHY NOT LET THE READERS DETERMINE WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE AND NOT? THEY ARE ADULTS, SO TREAT THEM AS SUCH. IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, YOU WILL SOON SEE VERIFICATION BEFORE YOUR EYES. BUT IF NOT, YOU’RE WRONG.
SO RATHER THAN FIGHT AGAINST EACH OTHER, LET’S FIGHT TOGETHER.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 4, 2017 1:13:45 GMT
If you want to be treated like an adult, read the rules and make your posts in-kind. Your post had absolutely nothing to do with the heightist aspect of dating. This is not my fault, it's your fault. I'd advise you not to continue to fuel the flames of in-fighting here. The rules have been specifically written to prevent this forum from turning into a "crabs in a bucket" scenario like r/short.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 4, 2017 1:18:37 GMT
The Number One complaint by men like "you" is dating. You only care about your personal dating life, while the bulk of the remaining posters here care about the systemic discrimination in the workplace, the completely hateful stereotypes, healthy short children being injected with chemicals to try to make them grow taller, the wage gap, and on-and-on. Not one person who has ever been a mainstay in the anti-heightism world would list dating as their #1 concern. R/short is the first place where dating has taken center stage. The rules here were specifically written to keep the focus on heightism as a whole so this didn't turn into a dating whinefest like r/short. This is not going to change. You're more than welcome to keep posting about dating here, just as long as the posts focus on the hypocrisies, hatefulness, and discriminatory aspects of dating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 4, 2017 1:21:29 GMT
For those who didn't read the thread he's referring to. I'll paraphrase it for you
"I dated a tall woman and she had a really deep pussy. I couldn't even touch the sides."
"Tall women's bodies are engineered to hoard as many resources as possible, so they have deep pussies to coincide with their large bodies. This is why they are evolutionarily-primed to prefer tall men."
So, as you can see, there's absolutely no reason to get bent out of shape over this thread being deleted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 4, 2017 1:45:09 GMT
No one ever said "heightism doesn't have anything to do with dating." This is a straw man argument on your part. The particular post that was deleted had nothing to do with the heightist element of dating. "Tall women have deep pussies" sounds more like Def Comedy Jam than anything to do with sociological trends. You can talk about pussy if it somehow relates to heightism, thus, we don't delete threads for "moral" reasons, but it has to relate to heightism in some way. I'm going to ask you nicely to refrain from future straw man arguments and other intellectually-dishonest tactics.
|
|
|
|
Post by fjohnson on Jul 4, 2017 17:05:58 GMT
Sir
The sentences you quote were from the other poster. Here are the exact words I wrote.
Now, the humorous/sad part of the story. A week or so later came the big night we were have sex on her sofa. We are in the missionary position, and I entered her as easily and effortlessly as I ever had in my life. I mean I didn’t have to make any adjustments i.e. I was not too high, too low, a little off to the right, etc. I slid in with no effort and no resistance what so ever. I found out why in 2-3 seconds. I was in the biggest gapping cavernous vagina I had ever been in my life. I mean I couldn’t feel a thing, and when I say a thing, I mean absolutely nothing. It was like f*cking a 1 gallon paint can. I couldn’t touch the bottom, I couldn’t touch the sides and there was no feeling in the opening.
This is one case where bigger is definitely not better. I actually felt sorry for her, for no woman would want to be like she was. And here is the sad thing, I liked her a lot. She had an awesome body, 36C, 28, 42 at 155 pounds, blond hair, blue eyes.
I AM SURE OTHERS WHO READ THE ORIGINAL POST WILL RECOGNIZE MY WORDS. BUT FROM THIS POINT FORWARD, I WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS. I THOUGHT I WOULD MAKE A PLAY ON WORDS, AS WOMEN OBSESS ON BIGGER IS BETTER WHEN IT COMES TO MEN. MY POINT HERE BIGGER ISN'T ALWAYS BETTER, AND HERE IS WHY. THE POST WAS NOT MADE TO BE A DEEP THOUGHT PROVOCATING HIGH LEVEL DISCUSSION, BUT A SOMEONE HUMOROUS READ.
AGAIN, I WILL CONFORM. WE NEED TO ALL WORK TOGETHER.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Jul 4, 2017 17:50:28 GMT
Thanks for the explanation. I now understand where you were coming from better. You are correct that the quotes were from the other poster. I listed them because they made the thread a target for deletion, just as much as the reasons I stated that the post was irrelevant.
You were basically making a joke, and not trying to advance a theory. If it had been more evident that this was the case, I certainly wouldn't have deleted the thread, and would've supplied some one-liners of my own.
Thanks for doing what's best for the sake of communal harmony. I have no problems with us making jokes to expose hypocrisy, so feel free to make posts like that in the future. I'm glad we've found common ground because as you stated, we need to work together.
|
|
|
|
Post by fjohnson on Jul 5, 2017 23:08:31 GMT
Mr Admin. I will post the my original story, "Bigger is not always better – a Vagina story"
|
|
|
|
Post by toughlimbs on Jul 5, 2017 23:11:12 GMT
I want to read that. I missed out.
|
|
