|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 5, 2018 16:51:57 GMT
I want to discuss this piece of shit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/short/comments/a386m2/why_i_deny_heightism/
|
|
|
Post by valorzeal33 on Dec 5, 2018 19:11:36 GMT
What caught my eye is mike5f4’s question to Bikerbats:
“I have been using the words height bigotry more lately.
“Question: How do you respond to the president of the United States recently saying that a particular woman of 5'3" being too short to head a particular department in his administration? This is not an uncommon belief in hierarchy positions. Is that not blanket discrimination? What words would you use to discribe this type of practice?”
Bikerbats will have a difficult time answering that.
|
|
|
Post by HeightismAOS on Dec 5, 2018 19:13:36 GMT
Bikerbats is being his usual idiotic self: As far as I'm concerned, this is his personal problem, because his brain is so simple that it conflates words just because they end similarly. What about terms like "ageism," which are recognized and accepted as legitimate nowadays? A girl back in my highschool actually did a whole presentation on ageism (she called it that and everything), and everyone clapped and praised her for it. Either way, it's obvious Biker is using the old fallacy of relative privation to downplay heightism.
Why didn't he link a study proving how "those born with a leg up in the world are just more likely to be tall?" Does research suddenly not matter to him now? I like how he chooses the position based on zero research, rather than the stance backed by countless studies. Do a quick google search for "how much of height is genetic," and one will quickly realize how grossly exaggerated it is when people link tall height with being born to a better family. What's funny is that truthfully, no amount of research will ever be enough. For example, we have the study which shows how self-employed short people suddenly don't make less money than tall folk, because there's no employer to deal with. It's been posted on /r/short more than once so Biker must have seen it. Like I said back in this thread, Biker will demand a thousand pieces of evidence from those who discuss heightism, but a female member can complain about anything without a study to back it up, and Biker will just take their word for it. Despite the fact that only short men have higher suicide rates, Biker automatically believes the anecdotes of short females but not short males.
Biker aside, the best part are the other garmins in the comments. They are desperate to signal their docility.
What caught my eye is mike5f4’s question to Bikerbats: “I have been using the words height bigotry more lately. “Question: How do you respond to the president of the United States recently saying that a particular woman of 5'3" being too short to head a particular department in his administration? This is not an uncommon belief in hierarchy positions. Is that not blanket discrimination? What words would you use to discribe this type of practice?” Bikerbats will have a difficult time answering that. You know it's bad when mikeypoo is the one asking the hard questions. I'm looking forward to seeing if the usual suspects such as Biker, redneck, or yamoth respond to how Bob Corker and Janet Yellen have literally been denied a position due to height. By the way, check out these screenshots I saved from last year. Not only Trump, but you have people on the other side of the political spectrum literally admitting how much height matters in politics. Yet these garmins want to claim the success of tall people is all due to being born in a well-off family?
|
|
|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 5, 2018 23:27:30 GMT
Bikerbats is feeling the pressure. There has been more posts about heightism lately and I feel like if he doesnt slightly bend than maybe people will leave r/short. He disgusts me. How can one person be such a sell out. Ugh.
|
|
|
Post by HeightismAOS on Dec 6, 2018 1:38:58 GMT
Bikerbats is feeling the pressure. There has been more posts about heightism lately and I feel like if he doesnt slightly bend than maybe people will leave r/short. He disgusts me. How can one person be such a sell out. Ugh.
Now if only good old Geoffrey can get his nose out of Biker's asscrack and see what's really going on.
|
|
|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 6, 2018 1:46:10 GMT
Has anyone considered bikerbats might be getting paid to derail the movement? He has characteristics of a still.
|
|
|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 6, 2018 8:01:00 GMT
Dude seriously you can't keep on sharing peop,as identity without their consent. It's illegal. Someone can sue you for that.
|
|
|
Post by HeightismAOS on Dec 6, 2018 10:05:04 GMT
Dude seriously you can't keep on sharing peop,as identity without their consent. It's illegal. Someone can sue you for that. Biker posted that pic himself on /r/short.
|
|
|
Post by valorzeal33 on Dec 6, 2018 12:24:35 GMT
Dude seriously you can't keep on sharing peop,as identity without their consent. It's illegal. Someone can sue you for that. Biker posted that pic himself on /r/short. Bikerbats probably thinks this is his best picture since it’s the only picture he’s been showing in public for a while now. He’s literally hiding his face with a huge beard and accessories.
|
|
|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 7, 2018 6:34:33 GMT
Yea keep doing what you are doing. You will soon end up in legal trouble.
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Dec 7, 2018 10:25:29 GMT
Yea keep doing what you are doing. You will soon end up in legal trouble. You can't get in legal trouble for posting pics of someone they've already posted. I don't want to hear another word about this on this forum because it's not worth discussing. I'm not allowing fake controversies to hijack the discussion here. Get back on topic.
|
|
|
Post by fightforheight on Dec 7, 2018 18:23:13 GMT
Now if only good old Geoffrey can get his nose out of Biker's asscrack and see what's really going on.
This guy sounds like he needs a nap lmao. He's acting like a 5 year old who got denied candy. His mood seems to be inconsistent, one minute telling people to fuck off, another happy go lucky and willing to acknowledge heightism, but conveniently it looks like around the same time a month ago he was the most in denial and oppossitional towards people like us, and always in a bad mood. I think that's when even r/short started to awaken to him. e.g "Buddy as a pure outsider you definitely come out looking the smaller man. Rotau was right, you're looking like you have caught a really bad case of hall monitor syndrome."
I like this part of what "Rotau" said every six months, there’s an askreddit about the smallest amount of power that’s ever gone to somebody’s head and next time you’ll be on it.It also looks like anyone who disagrees with this guy is labeled a troll. Did the big bad Mod run out of rebuttals? That guy geoffreyarnold looks like he's on our side, but I don't see him saying anything to this mod. What's wrong with him?
|
|
|
Post by shortguytom on Dec 7, 2018 19:41:02 GMT
Yea keep doing what you are doing. You will soon end up in legal trouble. You can't get in legal trouble for posting pics of someone they've already posted. I don't want to hear another word about this on this forum because it's not worth discussing. I'm not allowing fake controversies to hijack the discussion here. Get back on topic. Yes you can. I hate that shit. Seriously its a gross violation of someones privacy. I posted my pictures on a dating site and I saw someone hijack that shit on another site. Its illegal. Bikerbats is a douchebag. but seriously its fucking low. And do what you want heightism report.
|
|
|
Post by Heightism Report on Dec 7, 2018 19:51:32 GMT
shortguytom is banned. Something wasn't right about him from the get-go, and you have to be either an ignorant child, a troll, or an absolute fucking imbecile to believe that it's illegal to post a picture of someone one that they have already shared. I wouldn't have banned him if he just wanted to discuss whether or not revealing the identity of internet clowns has merit, but he was making statements about it being flat-out illegal, which is a ridiculous thing to say. Either way, this isn't a forum for ignorant children, trolls, or imbeciles, thus, he can feel free to look for another forum. He has hijacked the discussion, which is a violation of the rules in of itself, in addition to ignoring the warning he was given for drumming-up a fake controversy with his ignorant stance that it's illegal to post photos that people have publicly shared of themselves. Regardless, we don't allow people who are trolls, or, those who have viewpoints so ignorant that they look like trolls to post here.
In other news, this thread will remain open because it's important to discuss phonies such as Bikerbats because they are the type of cowards who don't have the cajones(or possibly the intelligence) to look at the world for what it truly is.
|
|
|
Post by fightforheight on Dec 7, 2018 20:01:27 GMT
shortguytom is banned. Something wasn't right about him from the get-go, and you have to be either an ignorant child, a troll, or an absolute fucking imbecile to believe that it's illegal to post a picture of someone one that they have already shared. Either way, this isn't a forum for ignorant children, trolls, or imbeciles, thus, he can feel free to look for another forum. He has hijacked the discussion, which is a violation of the rules in of itself and we don't allow people who are trolls, or, have viewpoints so ignorant that they look like trolls to post here. He sounds about 12. Most of his posts look very short and are just insults. Also, you can easily tell that it's legal to post a picture by looking at reddit. Millions of pictures are shared everyday and resposted, they don't get deleted.
|
|